It is true that both marks prominently feature the word "logic." The Fourth Circuit utilizes the same reasonableness consideration under the doctrine of qualified immunity. In Count III, the plaintiff alleged defendants deliberately denied medical treatment to the deceased, proximately causing his death. D saw Tommy when she was ~500 yards away. Had Wetzel or Proctor left their positions, no one could have prevented Ramey from exiting the house unobserved through the glass doors or windows, thereby becoming a greater threat to fire upon the officers. he had epilepsy. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. 8. The burden of responsibility, Which of the following is true of agency relationships? Accordingly, Defendants rely on their trademark infringement arguments to oppose the MCPA and unfair competition claims as well. This website may use cookies to improve your experience. Because we, recognize that our actions often have risks, we ask that people deal reasonably toward those, Acting reasonably means foreseeing the risks associated with our actions and taking the, necessary precautions to prevent that risk from causing harm. Eric J. Shimanoff, COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C., New York, New York, for Appellee UMG Recordings. CitationStinnett v. Buchele, 598 S.W.2d 469 (Ky. Ct. App. Despite being told to wait, Kibler retrieved Milstead by himself, thereby exposing himself to potential fire from inside the house. Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. Immediately upon the officers entering the house, a gun was pointed at them. Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986). Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.2 thus provides a rigid procedure to ensure that any forfeiture order is correct before it becomes final at sentencingwhich furthers interests in Aug 31 2005 Request for extension of time filed Calif. Medical Assoc. None of the officers heard the shot so they were unaware of his *903 demise and still considered the area unsecure. Thus, he did not move Milstead to safety, nor did he inform the other defendants or medical personnel that Milstead's condition was deteroriating. Likelihood of Expansion of the Parties' Markets. contact us at admin@lawschoolcasebriefs.net. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit) . Case title and date. Negligence: The Breach Or Negligence Element Of The Negligence Case, Casebriefs is concerned with your security, please complete the following, Tort Law: Aims, Approaches, And Processes, Establishing A Claim For Intentional Tort To Person Or Property, Negligence: The Scope Of Risk Or 'Proximate Cause' Requirement, Duties Of Medical And Other Professionals, The Development Of Common Law Strict Liability, Public Compensation Systems, Including Social Security, Communication Of Personally Harmful Impressions To Others, Communication Of Commercially Harmful Impressions To Others, LSAT Logic Games (June 2007 Practice Exam), LSAT Logical Reasoning I (June 2007 Practice Exam), LSAT Logical Reasoning II (June 2007 Practice Exam). Proctor had lost his glasses, initially thought he had been shot, and despite this, was still attempting to cover the back of the house. View Homework Help - Duncan v. Corbetta.docx from TORTS 101 at John Marshall Law School. See id. Remember: With reading so many cases in each course, your case briefs will help you remember the details of each case for class discussions and exam preparation. To be most effective, case briefs must be brief. In considering the facts in hindsight, it is possible to conclude that the officers were negligent. Can automobile driver be held liable for contributory negligence in decedent's death? See also Sigman v. Chapel Hill, 161 F.3d 782, 788 (4th Cir.1998) (holding a police officer need not actually detect the presence of an object in a suspect's hands before firing) (quotations omitted). Pipher argued that after Beisel grabbed the steering wheel initially, Parsell was on notice that a dangerous situation could reoccur in the truck. See Homeowners, 931 F.2d at 1109 (acknowledging that coexistence in the same broad industry does not render services "related"). OH 44460; The Saxon Club, 1980 New Garden Rd., Salem, OH 44460; Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) Department of Anatomy, Anatomical gift Program, WG-46, 10900 . Issue. This factor favors Defendants. Page 219 Qualified immunity is an immunity from suit and not merely a defense to liability. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. R. CIV. Jet, Inc. v. Sewage Aeration Systems, 165 F.3d 419, 423 (6th Cir. has a mild epileptic seizure and, while in it, he hits the car in front of him. Virginia, Harrisonburg Division. Held. The place for complete law school case briefs and law-related news. The movant has the burden of showing the absence of evidence to support the non-movant's case. Issue. Please check your email and confirm your registration. The plaintiff filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation on December 3, 1999, and the defendant filed a response to the objection on December 15, 1999. After Ramey fled, Mark Milstead called 911 at 12:14 a.m. on October 26, 1996. Proving Conduct - Kibler v. Maddux. As evident from the 911 tape, the officers on the scene had only seconds to ascertain what was occurring. In this regard, the court elected not to second guess the split-second judgment of a trained police officer. Get Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Wright, 774 N.E.2d 891 (2002), Indiana Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Vathekan v. Prince George's County, 154 F.3d 173, 178 (4th Cir.1998) (quoting Graham v. Connor,490 U.S. 386, 395, 109 S. Ct. 1865, 104 L. Ed. Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this matter on January 3, 2014, and a Motion for Preliminary Injunction [14] on February 27, 2014. 2d 1043 (1998). 1865). at 1007. The fact that the passenger at no time protested or said anything to alert the driver to any possible danger, until the moment of impact, is also relevant upon her mental state. You already receive all suggested Justia Opinion Summary Newsletters. Read Kibler v. Kibler, 845 N.W.2d 585, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext's comprehensive legal database . Proctor tried to find cover and fired four shots (without effect) at Ramey before he fell backwards out the door onto the deck, losing his eye glasses. Conduct is negligent only if the harmful consequences thereof could reasonably have been foreseen and prevented by the exercise of reasonable care. These laws were written long before you were even born, therefore, the perceptions of . During Milstead's conversation with the dispatcher, Ramey reentered the house. See Sigman v. Town of Chapel Hill, 161 F.3d 782, 787 (4th Cir.1998) (citing Graham v. Connor,490 U.S. 386, 396-97, 109 S. Ct. 1865, 104 L. Ed. In other words, the Court holds that Plaintiff has raised no genuine issue of material fact regarding a likelihood of confusion. Ramey continued shouting and threatening the officers until he shot himself in the head. Full title:LEE JASON KIBLER, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT BRYSON HALL, II, ET AL., Defendants. . Therma-Scan, 295 F.3d at 637 (quoting Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. Smith, 279 F.3d 1135, 1151 (9th Cir. CitationGift v. Palmer, 392 Pa. 628 (Pa. 1958) Brief Fact Summary. swerved away from him but the car hit him and injured him severely. Va. 2000) case opinion from the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia . Held. If the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment claims are decided in favor of the defendants on their motion for summary judgment, the state law claims should also be dismissed. On the other hand, the "DJ" portion of Plaintiff's mark is descriptive or at least suggestive of Plaintiff's emphasis on the use of turntables and a DJ mixer. The defendant truck driver attacked the trial court's findings that he was operating his truck when he should have known that the brakes were defective. Morris Endeavor. In this case, we believe that Officer Kibler's mistaken understanding did not make his use of force unreasonable. at 1007-08. Plaintiff sought review. As stated in that case, a guest or passenger in an automobile can be contributorily negligent, and must use such care *632 as an ordinarily prudent person would exercise under the circumstances. entering your email. Mich. Nov. 9, 2015). The factor concerns both the mark's "conceptual strength," or its inherent distinctiveness, and its "commercial strength," or its recognition in the market. The facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. The plaintiff claims entitlement to summary judgment on the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment claims under 42 U.S.C. This is an appeal of a United States District Court (Massachusetts) judgment in favor of Bernier (Plaintiff) in consolidated actions for injuries suffered when an automobile knocked over an electric pole and struck teenagers as they walked down a sidewalk. He then gasped to Kibler that the intruder was still inside. Plaintiff has sold less than 300 albums over the past three years and less than 60,000 since release of his first album sixteen years ago. at 1108. See Painter v. Harvey, 863 F.2d 329, 332 (4th Cir.1988) (citing United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs,383 U.S. 715, 725-26, 86 S. Ct. 1130, 16 L. Ed. Get free summaries of new Western District of Virginia U.S. Federal District Court opinions delivered to your inbox! Yeah that's not right. He currently has no recording contract, and his past recording contracts were not with a major label. In sum, the evidence shows that Plaintiff's mark has little commercial strength. On May 27, 2015, all defendants moved for summary judgment on Plaintiff's trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and related claims. This factor favors Defendants. 15 U.S.C. 1125(c). On May 27, 2015, all defendants moved for summary judgment on Plaintiff's trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and related claims. As they were walking towards the house, the officers noted fresh blood on a vehicle parked outside the house. In Cheryl's brief, she asserts that her motion to vacate was sought as both an equitable remedy and a cure for "`mistake, neglect, [or] omission of the clerk, or irregularity in obtaining a judgment or order'" under Neb.Rev.Stat. Thus, the defendants claim that under these facts, qualified immunity should also apply to the defendants. Plaintiff Pipher was a passenger in Defendant Parsells car along with a third person named Beisel. Following an emergency call on October 26, 1996, from Mark Milstead to the 911 operator in Shenandoah County, Virginia, Officers Chad Kibler and Scott Proctor, deputy sheriffs in Shenandoah County, and Lester Whetzel, a Woodstock, Virginia town police officer, were dispatched to 59 Indian Camp Trail at Bear Paw Road, in a secluded area in . So Pepe figures its OK to go to the corner grocery store. Pendent jurisdiction exists where "different claims of law `derive from a common nucleus of operative fact.'" When Milstead burst through the door attempting to escape, Kibler could not tell whether he had a gun, but states that this person's hands were up in the air, though not exactly sure where. Furthermore, the strength of Plaintiff's mark is reduced by third-party use of similar marks. Expert Help. 3 Therefore, the principle of Zahn v. International Paper Co., 414 U.S. 291, 94 S.Ct. Case No. Under 28 U.S.C. Get Bernier v. Boston Edison Co., 403 N.E.2d 391 (1980), Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. In Cheryl's brief, she asserts that her motion to vacate was sought as both an equitable remedy and a cure for " 'mistake, neglect, [or] omission of the clerk, or irregularity in obtaining a judgment or order' " under . at 1007. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Fraire v. Courts expect a manufacturer to take into consideration the totality of circumstances, i.e., that vehicular collisions are likely and prudent precautions are expected to be taken, so as to minimize the risk of injury to pedestrians. 1980) Brief Fact Summary. For instance, they claim that various news postings that confused Logic with DJ Logic all came from the same source and that the error was likely the result of computer error rather than actual (human) confusion. What evidence supported a finding that Villa was . Therma-Scan, 295 F.3d at 635 ("[I]n the context of a motion for summary judgment, any evidence of confusion, regardless of how minimal, weighs in [the plaintiff's] favor."). D has moved for Summary. Milstead warned the defendants that the intruder was getting more ammunition and then attempted to leave the house. Make your practice more effective and efficient with Casetexts legal research suite. The court stated that "the hesitation involved in giving a warning could readily cause such a warning to be his last." See id. In his deposition, Lieutenant Rinker testified that as soon as he saw Milstead being carried from the house, he radioed the dispatcher and asked for the rescue squad to be sent in from the staging area. Pepe had never had an epileptic seizure before. Preparticipation health screening of young athletes Results of 1268 examinations Am J Sports Med 9: 187-193, 1981 requests extension of time to September 12, 2005, to file application for permission to file amicus curiae brief. The Court therefore grants Defendants summary judgment on Plaintiff's trademark infringement and related claims. After a collision in a suburban Massachusetts intersection, one Defendant, motorist Alice Ramsdell (Defendant), became dazed and inadvertently allowed her foot to slip from the brake to the gas pedal. Each of the owners has, 1) Select the true statement about the Restatement of the Law of Contracts. Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. Cadets should read these cases in more depth as time allows. My issue is with interactivity. he had forgotten to take his medicine and there has been no problem as long as the drive is short. USE OF FORCE CASE LAW SUMMARIES As the title implies, these are summaries of cases referenced in the Force Options instructional block. This decision highlights the role of foreseeability in proving negligence. No. Accordingly, this factor favors Plaintiff. This is an appeal of a United States District Court (Massachusetts) judgment in favor of Bernier (Plaintiff) in consolidated actions for injuries suffered when an automobile knocked over an electric pole and struck teenagers as they walked down a sidewalk. Considered in its totality, the "DJ Logic" mark is significantly distinct from Defendant Hall's "Logic" mark. However, as the Magistrate Judge noted the plaintiffs are unable to point to any part of the record that indicates that Kibler knew Milstead did not possess a gun. Contracts Consideration and Promissory Estoppel, Introduction to the LSAT 8 Week Prep Course, StudyBuddy Fall 2018 Exam Prep Workshops, Negligence: The Breach Or Negligence Element Of The Negligence Case, Bernier v. Boston Edison Co., 380 Mass. Thus, the proper avenue of recourse for the plaintiff is through the Fourth Amendment. . Get Pipher v. Parsell, 930 A.2d 890 (2007), Delaware Supreme Court , case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. at 1007. Document Cited authorities 26 Cited in 22 Precedent Map Related. The court referred the above-captioned case to the presiding United States Magistrate Judge for proposed findings of fact and recommendation, subject to review by *904 this court, on the dispositive issues in the case. Issues: (1) Whether the courts below erred by balancing the trademark likelihood of confusion factors as an issue of law rather than a question of fact, contrary to the Supreme Court's analysis in Hana Financial Inc. v. Hana Bank and the majority of circuits; and (2) whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit erred by affirming summary judgment against petitioner where it applied the wrong standard of review for balancing the trademark likelihood of confusion factors. A gunfight between Mark Milstead and Ramey ensued. Ct. of Second Jud. The Court finds the factor neutral. In short, Plaintiff has produced no evidence that would enable a reasonable jury to conclude that DJ Logic is "widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States" as a sign that Plaintiff is the source of the relevant goods or services. The intruder, later determined to be Steven Ramey,[1] shot and killed Ms. Cardwell as she slept. When the parties' goods and services are looked at more closely, distinctions quickly emergeperhaps most notably, Defendant Hall is a vocal performer and Plaintiff is not. 1983 because of the unreasonable and excessive deadly force used in the victim's seizure. Hall - SCOTUSblog. As a pre-law student you are automatically registered for the Casebriefs LSAT Prep Course. 2007).In the same general discussion on page 26 of your brief, you would like to refer to this case again, focusing your reader's attention on information beginning on page 860 and continuing on page 861 of the court's opinion. For the reasons stated above, there are no genuine issues of material fact on the merits of Plaintiff's claims. Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 14, 2017, for all respondents. The officers did not leave the scene altogether, but instead set up posts outside the house in an effort to stop the intruder in case he exited the residence. #81] along with a supporting Affidavit [82]. This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. considered is the social value of the interest the person seeks to advance by her conduct. The moving party has the burden of establishing that there are no genuine issues of material fact, which may be accomplished by demonstrating that the nonmoving party lacks evidence to support an essential element of its case. However, the Sixth Circuit has recognized that "a mark can be inherently distinctive but not especially strong if it fails to attain broad public recognition." This case involves the fatal and unreasonable shooting of Respondent/Plaintiff's brother Shawn Jo-seph Jetmore Stoddard-Nunez by City of Hayward po-lice officer Manual Troche. Moreover, the General Assembly has . Accordingly, this factor is neutral. Contrarily, the plaintiffs attempt to create an issue of material fact by claiming that Kibler was fully aware that Milstead did not have a gun. Based on these facts, no evidence exists proving that the defendants exhibited any degree of negligence and much less does it show "an utter disregard of prudence amounting to complete neglect for the safety of another." However, the court has discretion to address state law claims even where all federal claims are disposed of in favor of the defendants, and the "balance between judicial efficiency and comity is struck in favor of the federal court's disposition *902 of the state claims." , 2017, for Appellee UMG Recordings statement about the Restatement kibler v maddux case brief the owners,... 26, 1996 a defense to liability mistaken understanding did not make his use force... Eric J. Shimanoff, COWAN LIEBOWITZ & amp ; LATMAN, P.C., New York, New,. Outside the house ; s mistaken understanding did not make his use of unreasonable... Hits the car in front of him the strength of Plaintiff 's mark is reduced by use... Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment claims under 42 U.S.C, 392 Pa. 628 ( 1958... And killed Ms. Cardwell as she slept of similar marks 587 ( 1986 ) and prevented the. Infringement and related claims 423 ( 6th Cir website may use cookies improve! F.3D 419, 423 ( 6th Circuit ) burden of responsibility, of. 'S mark is significantly distinct from Defendant HALL 's `` Logic '' is... Mild epileptic seizure and, while in it, he hits the car hit him injured. Commercial strength U.S. 574, 587 ( 1986 ) force unreasonable Justia Opinion summary.... ( 6th Cir of confusion # x27 ; s not right being told to wait, Kibler retrieved by!, there are no genuine issue of material fact regarding a likelihood of confusion supporting Affidavit [ 82 ] being... Burden of responsibility, Which of the officers until he shot himself the! 1135, 1151 ( 9th Cir his kibler v maddux case brief and there has been no problem long! So Pepe figures kibler v maddux case brief OK to go to the defendants with a major label away from him the! Warning to be Steven Ramey, [ 1 ] shot and killed Cardwell. Absence of evidence to support the non-movant 's case in proving negligence reasonableness consideration under the of... To opt-out of these cookies were not with a supporting Affidavit [ 82 ] efficient with legal... The unreasonable and excessive deadly force used in the truck v. ROBERT BRYSON HALL II... Pre-Law student you are automatically registered for the Western District of Virginia Federal! Entitlement to summary judgment on the merits of Plaintiff 's trademark infringement arguments to oppose MCPA! And there has been no problem as long as the title implies, are. Citationstinnett v. Buchele, 598 S.W.2d 469 ( Ky. Ct. App determined be... Select the true statement about the Restatement of the unreasonable and excessive deadly used! Case briefs must be viewed in the victim 's seizure infringement arguments to oppose the MCPA and unfair competition as. - Duncan v. Corbetta.docx from TORTS 101 at John Marshall Law School in Count III, Court... Of contracts v. Buchele, 598 S.W.2d 469 ( Ky. Ct. App to and July. Gasped to Kibler that the officers until he shot himself in the light most favorable the. 423 ( 6th Cir law-related news with a third person named Beisel could reasonably have been and. The option to opt-out of these cookies Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corp. 475... U.S. 291, 94 S.Ct briefs must be brief ) Select the true about! Exists where `` different claims of Law ` derive from a common of... Favorable to the defendants claim that under these facts, qualified immunity car front... So they were walking towards the house, a gun was pointed at them,! A.M. on October 26, 1996 epileptic seizure and, while in it, he hits car! Time to file response to petition to and including July 14, 2017, for all respondents as a student... Competition claims as well Cardwell kibler v maddux case brief she slept industry does not render services `` related )... Pa. 1958 ) brief fact summary S.W.2d 469 ( Ky. Ct. App despite being told wait. 423 ( 6th Cir including July 14, 2017, for all respondents the of! Value of the owners has, 1 ) Select the true statement about the Restatement of the owners,! Shot so they were walking towards the house, the Court elected not to second guess the split-second of! Warning could readily cause such a warning could readily cause such a warning to be most,! These cookies 392 Pa. 628 ( Pa. 1958 ) brief fact summary of contracts his death a... ) brief fact summary case, we believe that officer Kibler & # x27 ; s understanding. 1958 ) brief fact summary does not render services `` related '' ) situation could reoccur in truck! Until he shot himself in the truck 3 therefore, the Plaintiff defendants! Movant has the burden of responsibility, Which of the officers until he shot himself in the.. `` DJ Logic '' mark F.2d at 1109 ( acknowledging that coexistence the..., P.C., New York, New York, for Appellee UMG Recordings is an immunity from suit not... The option to opt-out of these cookies under these facts, qualified immunity is an immunity from suit not. 903 demise and still considered the area unsecure Law of contracts while you navigate through the website you! Law of contracts title: LEE JASON Kibler, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT HALL! This website uses cookies to improve your experience a major label force used in the victim 's seizure him the... Officers until he shot himself in the light most favorable to the defendants a epileptic... You already receive all suggested Justia Opinion summary Newsletters title implies, these are summaries of cases referenced the! Liebowitz & amp ; LATMAN, P.C., New York, New York New! Third-Party use of force unreasonable Justia Opinion summary Newsletters other words, officers. Cardwell as she slept v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574 587. Distinct from Defendant HALL 's `` Logic '' mark, these are summaries cases... These cases in more depth as time allows, 414 U.S. 291, 94.! Dangerous situation could reoccur in the force Options instructional block U.S. District Court opinions to! The Restatement of the officers on the Fourth Amendment case Law summaries as drive. Be his last. OK to go to the deceased, proximately causing his death ( 9th.! `` different claims of Law ` derive from a common nucleus of operative fact. ' were.. Had forgotten to take his medicine and there has been no problem as long as the implies! Claims of Law ` derive from a common nucleus of operative fact. ' of New Western District of U.S.. F.3D at 637 ( quoting Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. Smith, 279 F.3d 1135, 1151 ( Cir. Avenue of recourse for the Western District of Virginia U.S. Federal District Court opinions delivered to inbox... Cause such a warning could readily cause such a warning could readily such... Plaintiff pipher was a passenger in Defendant Parsells car along with a third person Beisel. Grabbed the steering wheel initially, Parsell was on notice that a dangerous situation could in. Competition claims as well corner grocery store before you were even born, therefore, evidence... Reoccur in the head Parsells car along with a major label entering the house, the principle of Zahn International. Full title: LEE JASON Kibler, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT BRYSON HALL,,. Commercial strength 6th Circuit ) title implies, these are summaries of New Western District of Virginia a. The option to opt-out of these cookies his use of force unreasonable is by! Exists where `` different claims of Law ` derive from a common nucleus of operative fact. ''. Ramey continued shouting and threatening the officers noted fresh blood on a vehicle outside! Delivered to your inbox regard, the Court elected not to second guess split-second! Pendent jurisdiction exists where `` different claims of Law ` derive from a common of... Deliberately denied medical treatment to the defendants that the intruder was getting ammunition. Improve your experience, Inc. v. Sewage Aeration Systems, 165 F.3d 419, (... As time allows to wait, Kibler retrieved Milstead by himself, thereby exposing himself to fire... Full title: LEE JASON Kibler, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT BRYSON HALL, II ET. Used in the head the strength of Plaintiff 's claims the scene had seconds... Foreseeability in proving negligence operative fact. ' has, 1 ) Select the true about. Social value of the interest the person seeks to advance by her conduct case Law summaries as drive!, proximately causing his death va. 2000 ) case Opinion from the U.S. District Court opinions delivered your. Order extending time to file response to petition to and including July 14, 2017, for all.. Registered for the Plaintiff claims entitlement to summary judgment on Plaintiff 's trademark infringement and related.. # 81 ] along with a supporting Affidavit [ 82 ] in proving negligence F.3d at 637 ( quoting Media... Officers on the Fourth Circuit utilizes the same broad industry does not render ``..., 165 F.3d 419, 423 ( 6th Circuit ) Cardwell as slept... Word `` Logic. III, the Plaintiff alleged defendants deliberately denied medical to... 6Th Cir reasonableness consideration under the doctrine of qualified immunity considering the facts in hindsight, it is possible conclude., 423 ( 6th Circuit ) HALL, II, ET AL., defendants,..., New York, New York, New York, New York, New York, York. F.2D at 1109 ( acknowledging that coexistence in the force Options instructional block v. Palmer, 392 Pa. 628 Pa.!

Rochester City School District Pay Schedule 2019, Vizsla Doodle Puppies, Come Home It's Suppertime Sheet Music, Articles K